Connor-Davidson Resiliency (CD-RISC) Scale:

Our assessment measures an individual’s ability and potential to bounce back from challenges, adapt to change, and maintain emotional well-being.

Individual resilience is the ability to overcome challenges. We are innately resilient. As we progress through life we are faced with stressors that may threaten our ability to bounce back. Alternatively, each challenge has the potential for growth and hence bolster our resiliency. However this growth is mediated by our current environment, genetics and previous life experiences.

The research on Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) supports this claim. The original ACE study and decades of research have linked ACEs to an increased risk of developing chronic diseases and behavioral challenges, including obesity, autoimmune disease, depression and alcoholism. The greater the number of ACEs, the greater the risk for negative outcomes.

Many of these Adverse Childhood Experiences can morph into trauma related experiences. This is especially true when an adult is faced with a trauma that alters the way they perceive events, which in turn, can make them less resilient. However, research has shown that traumatic life experiences can make us more resilient, if approached therapeutically.

We all have stories that embody individual resilience. Individual resilience is important to be measured as it represents the individual potential and ability to overcome adversity. However, behavior is context dependent and although the individual might consider themselves individually resilient, there are situational factors such as their respective occupation and workplace that impact job performance.

As the outside world can influence development, evolution also plays a role in testing our resilience. At one time, it was a benefit to our survival to carry with us the worry gene. Anticipating the worst was necessary when we were considered easy prey by faster and larger predators. Those who were apt to worry sought shelter and survived.

While our mortality may no longer be threatened daily, fear of losing things such as shelter, family, income, job, friends and reputation can still arise from the same flight or fight emotions. We also know this type of chronic stress undermines our physical and mental health.

Occupational Mindsets Scale:

Our individual resilience is constantly being tested by the outside. The ability to overcome internal and external stressors is evident as we mature and seek an occupation. The pursuit of an occupation comes with its own challenges. For example, a law school education involves reading case law involving unforeseen or negative consequences. Not surprisingly, this can awaken the “worry gene.” Once the law student becomes a lawyer, his success is often predicated on how he or she prepares or protects clients from anticipated negative consequences. Not surprisingly, this mindset might make them a “better lawyer,” if this trickles down to how they view the world, it will impair their resiliency.

Mindsets that undermine resiliency are identified as occupational mindset hazards and are not unique to the practice of law. Every occupation comes with a unique set of occupational mindsets that need to be assessed and identified. For example, a correctional officer has to be hypervigilant and anticipate the worst. Many correctional officers spend more time incarcerated than in the community. How can it be expected that the occupational mindsets learned on the job can be shut off once they come home?

Research has demonstrated that having healthy relationships and being optimistic can improve resiliency. If being hypervigilant and anticipating negative consequences is necessary to the successful performance of the occupation, how likely will the individual be able to be positive and develop healthy relationships? There is a reciprocal relationship between individual resiliency and the world in which the individual performs his occupation. For that reason, they must be assessed as separate and distinct.

Workplace Mental Health Scale (WMHS)

Our individual resilience is constantly being tested by the outside. The ability to overcome internal and external stressors is evident as we mature and seek an occupation. The pursuit of an occupation comes with its own challenges. For example, a law school education involves reading case law involving unforeseen or negative consequences. Not surprisingly, this can awaken the “worry gene.” Once the law student becomes a lawyer, his success is often predicated on how he or she prepares or protects clients from anticipated negative consequences. Not surprisingly, this mindset might make them a “better lawyer,” if this trickles down to how they view the world, it will impair their resiliency.

Mindsets that undermine resiliency are identified as occupational mindset hazards and are not unique to the practice of law. Every occupation comes with a unique set of occupational mindsets that need to be assessed and identified. For example, a correctional officer has to be hypervigilant and anticipate the worst. Many correctional officers spend more time incarcerated than in the community. How can it be expected that the occupational mindsets learned on the job can be shut off once they come home?

Research has demonstrated that having healthy relationships and being optimistic can improve resiliency. If being hypervigilant and anticipating negative consequences is necessary to the successful performance of the occupation, how likely will the individual be able to be positive and develop healthy relationships? There is a reciprocal relationship between individual resiliency and the world in which the individual performs his occupation. For that reason, they must be assessed as separate and distinct.